He’s labelled it ‘the weirdest waste of Australian money since every Baz Luhrmann movie ever made’.
The host of Last Week Tonight discussed the pair and how it is ‘dangerous to think of them as a moderating influence, as reassuring as that may feel’
HBO’s John Oliver wasn’t happy with war porn cheerleaders like Geraldo River and told him so in no uncertain turns on his HBO program Sunday night.
The Catheter Cowboy has a word for you (okay, just Donald Trump) about defending sexual predators, to run during the Bill O’Reilly Show!
Being on hiatus for the past few months, John Oliver said while promoting Sunday night’s first Last Week Tonight of the Donald Trump presidency, was like “being tied to a train track, watching the train coming.”
The long-form reports on “Last Week Tonight” kept us all informed abut the election, opioids and pyramid schemes
The unwelcome return of Carlos Danger.
“I’m staying in this country like the string quartet stayed on the Titanic,” Oliver cracked at a Tuesday event VIDEO
The Last Week Tonight host ridicules Trump’s recent performances and concocts a plan to get the Republican candidate to concede
“You would not be a loser—you would be a legend.”
Could the chaos in Britain come to the United States next?
On the upcoming British referendum on whether the U.K. should exit the E.U., the “Last Week Tonight” host expresses his ideas in a “violently British” way—some of which involves a hateful song.
“You would expect the Brexit camp to have some pretty solid arguments. Unfortunately, many of them are bullshit.”
Waleed Aly’s Gold Logie wasn’t only a win for diversity on Australian TV – it was a win for intelligent public debate.
He specifically called out Mike Huckabee for his wildly inflated scare tactics.
As illustrated in this political cartoon from 1870, it’s been associated with nasty, dehumanizing working conditions, health risks, and exploitation.
Je suis 19th century political commentary.
Sure, companies do what they can to say they’re against the use of child labor, but the current deal-driven state of the fashion industry makes it so there’s really no alternative.
I mean, how else do you think the $15 dress came into existence?
In the mid-’90s, it came out that Gifford’s clothing line was being produced in Honduras by 13- and 14-year-olds.
Ah, yeah that. Okay, so maybe the sweatshop scandal didn’t destroy her career after all.
See? It all comes full circle.
In 1995, it came out that Gap was using child labor to manufacture their clothes.
They promised to make changes.
In 2000, they had a similar situation in Cambodia, and yes, they promised to fix the problem.
And in 2007, they were hit with yet another child labor scandal, and yes, again, they promised to make changes.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, and it’s pretty clear we’re willing to accept child labor so long as it results in affordable fashion.
Some people take their demands to the streets.
And protest by becoming human billboards.
If you’re a company like Gap, Forever 21, or H&M, and you don’t know exactly which factory is producing your clothes, it’s probably bad news.
You invented something. And then you sold it for money.
(“Invent something” is pretty loosely defined here.)
But guess what, kiddos? There’s a brand new way of cashing in that’s taking America by storm. And the best part is, you don’t even have to, like, invent anything.
Patents are basically copyrights on ideas. You can also get them for things you can hold in your hand, but patents on things you can actually hold in your hand is so 20th century!
Now, for this to work, you have to make sure your patents are super-broad and vague so that they encompass pretty much anything you can think of.
Did you do it? Nope. Vaguer. Vaguer. OK, good.
Now sue the pants off the people who actually invent things that could potentially kinda sorta be covered by your super-vague patents but are too poor and/or skittish to fight you in court!
You may have heard John Oliver talk about it on his show.
While Oliver makes some fantastic points about how ordinary people and small businesses get railroaded by companies that make their living suing people for patent infringement, he leaves one big thing out.
Threatening innovators with huge lawsuits and hoping they settle out of fear isn’t just one of the shadiest ways of doing business imaginable.
Remember how in 1875, we didn’t have cars? Or planes? Or mass-produced electric lightbulbs? And then, within 30 years, we had all those things?
(Also zeppelins. How could I forget zeppelins?)
That was because people thought, “Hey! Why don’t I invent this really cool thing that doesn’t exist already so that I can make a ton of money.”
But now, all the people who would otherwise be inventing all the cool stuff are saying to themselves, “Hey! Why don’t I not invent anything because if I do, I’m just going to get sued by someone who claims to hold the patent on it already.”
Don’t take it from me. Take it from this super-dense paragraph about how, despite a booming market and high demand, companies have stopped developing software for storing medical images.
“Why, precisely when the market for their product had just taken off, would companies stop innovating? An explanation comes from Catherine Tucker, an economist at MIT who has studied the medical IT sector. In an unpublished study, she shows that the slowdown in R&D occurred as a result of litigation by a company whose primary reason for existing is to acquire the rights to others’ inventions and file patent claims against producers of related products — a patent troll. Tucker’s study is, to date, one of the best pieces of quantitative evidence of the broken state of America’s patent system, a critical concern not just for improving health care but for encouraging the innovation that’s needed to ensure future economic prosperity.” — Ray Fisman, Slate, April 9, 2012
Or this one, about how companies named in a patent infringement lawsuit are more likely to limit research and development spending.
“Researchers from Harvard and the University of Texas recently examined R&D spending of publicly listed firms that had been sued by patent trolls. They compared firms where the suit was dismissed, representing a clear win for the defendant, to those where the suit was settled or went to final adjudication (typically much more costly). As in the previous paper, this comparison helped them isolate the effect of lawsuits from other factors. They found that when lawsuits were not dismissed, firms reduced their R&D spending by $211 million and reduced their patenting significantly in subsequent years. The reduction in R&D spending represents a 48% decline.” — James Bessen, Harvard Business Review, Nov. 2014
(Honestly, we’re too bored to fight over this one.)
But the last version of it never came to a vote in the Senate, due in large part to pressure from lobbyists for trial lawyers.
If this whole terrible thing gets you steamed up and you’d like to translate your anger into productivity instead of deep self-loathing at your own powerlessness, what are you waiting for? You have a senator!
I would link their number for you, but only you know where you live. So go Google it!
Why is our fake news so much better than our “real” news? Oh, never mind, we all know the answer. Via Rolling Stone:
As Last Week Tonight host John Oliver notes early in his incredible, 20-minute examination of the global battle being fought over tobacco advertising, the smoking rate in the United States has dropped from 43 percent in 1965 to 18 percent today thanks to strict laws outlawing cigarette ads.
With America largely kicking its smoking habit, the tobacco industry has been forced to make up the revenues abroad, leading to court battles in countries like Australia, Uruguay and Togo, one of the 10 poorest nations in the world.
Oliver’s takedown also focuses on the extreme lengths companies like Philip Morris International are going to place their products in the hands of the youth, including a Marlboro-sponsored kiosk outside an Indonesian school where teens can purchase a single cigarette for a dime.