
Tag: Political Donations

Democracy screams “show us your money”
Analysis shows almost one-quarter of total party income was hidden from public view in 2021-22

The refunds indicate the Illinois House member has a strained relationship with pro-Israel groups that supported his reelection.
Source: Rep. Sean Casten Returns $50,000 in Pro-Israel Donations

Political Contributions: What America does transparently Australia’s LNP wants kept secret. We are among the world’s most secretive nations when it comes to political donors.
What Peters, Schrader, and Sinema have in common, however, is that each received substantial support from pharmaceutical companies before coming out against the bill. Both Peters’s and Schrader’s list of top contributors includes Pfizer and AbbVie. Sinema, whom Kaiser Health has called a “pharma favorite,” recently had her most successful fund-raising quarter ever, propelled by contributions from pharmaceutical company PACs, Gilead Science’s CEO Daniel O’Day, Eli Lilly CEO David Ricks, and Merck board chair Kenneth Frazier.
Source: Why Big Pharma Is Winning Again | Washington Monthly
The Mysterious ‘Other’: political donations and the devil in the detailed receipts – Michael West

How could 94% of the millions which made their way to political parties be deemed, not to be ‘Donations’, but instead ‘Other’? Is it a joke? Luke Stacey and Michael West investigate the bad joke which is dark money in Australian politics.
The Mysterious ‘Other’: political donations and the devil in the detailed receipts – Michael West
Investigation: how political donations protect a cosy loophole for Australia’s plutocrats – Michael West

“Political donations buy access to parliamentarians, they buy policy outcomes, and they buy a post-parliament career with the revolving door between politics and business”. Stephanie Tran and Michael West investigate the dark money which flows from Australia’s family business empires to the major political parties and identify a raft of failures in the donations system.
Investigation: how political donations protect a cosy loophole for Australia’s plutocrats – Michael West
Home – Michael West

Charities pay top dollar for dinner with Gladys Berejiklian despite regulator’s no-no to political donations by Michael West | Oct 15, 2020 | Business The Liberal Party is harvesting tens of thousands of dollars in donations from registered children’s charities and charities for the disabled. Michael West reports.
Home – Michael West
the system is designed by the lackeys of those who have an interest as a class in not paying tax, or in paying as little as possible. The argument that companies “pay all the tax as legally required” fails to address the question of why the tax system is rigged in their favour.
Speaking of political influence, it is interesting to note that some of the big contributors to the political coffers of the Coalition are also companies which pay no tax.
As Gareth Hutchens and Nick Evershed reported in The Guardian:
… the Greens have pointed out at least eight of the largest companies paid more money in donations to the Labor and Liberal and National parties in 2016-17 than they paid in corporate tax that year.
Chevron paid $82,228 in political donations in 2016-17, Origin Energy $103,574, Woodside Petroleum $279,000, Whitehaven Coal $30,000, and Santos $102,516, but none of them paid corporate tax that year.
Even when they are making a loss (either because of market conditions or tax avoidance or other circumstances) should big business not be paying a contribution, such as an operating fee or licence perhaps to the rest of us? This could be based on their gross income for the privilege of carrying on business here, and using the infrastructure, educated workforce and other benefits paid for by our taxes.
They do elsewhere (ODT)
And the politicians insist the money comes with no strings attached: it does not buy access or influence or favours or votes. But it does save taxpayers the cost of financing those election campaigns themselves.
Now the facade is slipping.
Like the government’s new independent parliamentary expenses authority – or a potential federal anti-corruption body – publicly funded campaigns would be another burden on long-suffering taxpayers.
But if we care about the integrity of our democracy we need to invest in it.
Simply put did Turnbull buy his primeministership? and who is he beholden to?
via Now everyone admits it: political donations buy access and influence
http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/03/20/bill-oreilly-i-never-bought-that-fox-is-the-con/202973
Bill O’Reilly Doesn’t Believe Fox News Leans Right
http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/09/26/bill-oreilly-doesnt-believe-fox-news-leans-righ/196117
News Corp., donated $1 million to the Republican Governors Association for the express purpose of defeating Democratic candidates. Asked for comment, News Corp.’s spokesman cited his support for “the RGA’s pro-business agenda.”
And now, the network’s most-watched host is calling the network “anti-liberal,” and the network’s website is trumpeting the column in which he makes the claim.
As Eric Boehlert said on MSNBC, there is “no daylight” between Fox News and the GOP, “and they don’t apparently care who knows it.”




You must be logged in to post a comment.