Tag: Who Pays?

Scott Morrison’s coronavirus stimulus package shows he has finally learnt to love deficits – Business – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Morrison looks pensive in front of a flag

It used to be called nationalisation; a term once considered abhorrent for any Liberal leader. But these aren’t normal times.

via Scott Morrison’s coronavirus stimulus package shows he has finally learnt to love deficits – Business – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Political advisers: a case of who you know, not what you know?

Barnaby Joyce (far left) in June last year with media adviser Vikki Campion (far right).

I don’t think I properly understood before that the hiring of political staffers is arbitrary and without scrutiny. One of Australia’s leading researchers in this area, Maria Maley, also at the ANU, has comprehensively reviewed federal political advisers in Australia. The news isn’t good. She describes advisers as “a cadre separate from the public service … partisan”. Under the Members of Parliament (Staff) Act, they are employed personally by ministers but their salaries are paid by the taxpayer.

Maley says one of the negative features of Australia’s arrangements is the secrecy surrounding the identity of ministerial staff. We don’t really know who they are, how they got there and why they were chosen. It’s awful.

Maley says the Coalition, under former prime minister John Howard, ditched the practice of naming advisers; and their identities are not readily publicly available. Everyone in Parliament House knows but not us. We pay the bills but we don’t know who they are.

via Political advisers: a case of who you know, not what you know?

Clive Palmer refinery: Taxpayers face multi-million-dollar bill to clean up Queensland Nickel site – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Taxpayers could be forced to stump up tens of millions of dollars to clean up the site of Clive Palmer’s north Queensland refinery.

Source: Clive Palmer refinery: Taxpayers face multi-million-dollar bill to clean up Queensland Nickel site – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Who pays if Hockey loses? Joe Hockey defamation case: Fairfax Media calls for documents regarding Treasurer’s involvement in North Sydney Forum as part of defamation case

Fairfax Media is defending a defamation case brought by Treasurer Joe Hockey, pictured, saying it was reasonable to publish details about the North Sydney Forum, which allegedly offered access to Mr Hockey in exchange for donations.

Fairfax Media has called on a Sydney Liberal Party fundraising forum to provide all documents regarding any involvement by federal Treasurer Joe Hockey in its activities as part of the defamation action brought by Mr Hockey.

The Treasurer is suing Fairfax for defamation in the Federal Court, claiming a series of articles published in The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times last year conveyed a series of defamatory meanings, including that he “accepted bribes paid to influence the decisions he made as Treasurer”.

Among the articles was a front-page story in May last year that carried the headline “Treasurer for sale”, about Mr Hockey’s alleged involvement in a Liberal Party Fundraising group known as the North Sydney Forum.

Fairfax is defending the case, saying it was reasonable to publish details about the North Sydney Forum, which allegedly offered access to Mr Hockey in exchange for donations to the forum of thousands of dollars, as it was information concerning government and political matters

The Federal Court heard on Wednesday that Fairfax has issued the North Sydney Forum with a subpoena effectively requesting any and all documents relating to Mr Hockey’s involvement in its activities, as well as documents about the activities of the forum more generally.

The subpoena includes a request for any documents relating to:

  • Any involvement by Mr Hockey in the establishment of the North Sydney Forum.
  • Any involvement by Mr Hockey in the forum’s fundraising activities between 2009 and May last year.
  • Any policy directive that the identity of members of the forum should be kept secret.
  • The use of funds by the forum, including any involvement by Mr Hockey in these decisions.
  • The process by which the National Australia Bank, the Financial Services Council, Restaurant and Catering Australia, Servcorp, Metcash and Australian Water Holdings allegedly became members of the forum, and
  • The alleged return of North Sydney Forum membership fees to Australian Water Holdings and any involvement by Mr Hockey in this alleged process.

It is possible that the forum will object to at least part of the subpoena, but it is yet to formally do so.

The court also heard on Wednesday that Mr Hockey has issued a subpoena to Pagemasters – the company which undertakes some sub-editing work for Fairfax Media.

It is understood that Mr Hockey is requesting all communications between Fairfax Media and Pagemasters in relation to the allegedly defamatory stories.

Mr Hockey is claiming that, as a result of articles published on May 5 under the headline “Treasurer for sale” he has been “greatly injured, shunned and avoided and his reputation has been and will be brought into disrepute, odium, ridicule and contempt”.

But Fairfax Media denies the articles and the headlines, including “Treasurer for sale”, are capable of defaming Mr Hockey in the way that he claims.

Further, it says the Australian public has a legitimate and significant interest in the implications of senior government ministers using the authority of their position to assist in fund-raising for a political party.

Mr Hockey said Fairfax Media’s “over-sensational, extravagant and unfair presentation” of the articles indicated an “intent to injure” him.

He is claiming aggravated damages, interest and costs.

Fairfax Media says the articles were based upon information obtained responsibly and fairly.

On Wednesday, Federal Court Registrar Michael Wall gave the North Sydney Forum until January 30 to formally object to the subpoena issued by Fairfax and ordered the parties to return to court on February 4.