Tag: Fair go

Bad intentions: Labor failing to protect whistleblower David McBride

Whistleblower

With Mark Dreyfus’s ancestry, you’d think he’d go out of his way to do something.

The rise of the Albanese government spared hopes of a new deal for people blowing the lid on government malfeasance. It isn’t working out that way for one prominent whistleblower, writes Callum Foote.

Source: Bad intentions: Labor failing to protect whistleblower David McBride

A ‘Fair Go’ is now a Myth – » The Australian Independent Media Network

So many issues in recent times, many of them pre-COVID-19, have highlighted how the Australia, which we tried to project to the world in 2000 as a Dinky Di paradise is dead, buried and cremated.(Thank you, Tony Abbott, for the quote! You certainly helped the rot set in!)

A ‘Fair Go’ is now a Myth – » The Australian Independent Media Network

Inequality in Australia and reclaiming the fair go

Inequality is rising but we can learn from an earlier, more egalitarian Australia and reclaim the “fair go”.

Source: Inequality in Australia and reclaiming the fair go

Australia’s core beliefs – where are they now? : The AIM Network

fair go

What happened to a ‘fair go’ in this country? It has long gone, writes Jack Gleeson. So who is to blame?

Above all else, Australians value a fair go for everyone. We expect our governments to put regulatory frameworks in place that ensure this.

A fair go demands equal and unbiased treatment for everyone.

We believe that all Australians are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law and the agencies of our government.

We believe in equality between men and women. We reject any legislation, policy or procedure that has the effect of discriminating against either gender.

We believe that our leaders should focus on making an equitable society rather than widening the gap between the rich and the poor. We reject foreign ideologies designed to give advantage to the privileged few and/or facilitate laissez faire capitalism.

We live in a society, not an economy.

We reject government policy based on simplistic financial profit and loss. We demand that our leaders take everything into account when setting macro policy. Even though many of us don’t know the term itself, the concept of the triple bottom line measuring economic value, social responsibility and environmental responsibility strikes a chord with us.

We expect our governments to invest in research to develop proactive solutions rather than trying to fix problems with reactive bandaid solutions.

We want Medicare and the PBS strengthened and retained.

We expect education and training opportunities for all our kids based on merit – not on ability to pay.

We won’t tolerate attacks on the most vulnerable in our society.

We expect that our senior citizens and those with disabilities will be looked after by governments.

We want job security. We expect that the Australian government will proactively seek to ensure this.

We further expect that if we are unfortunate enough to find ourselves unemployed the Government will provide effective user-friendly support services to assist us to find a new position.

We expect corporations and the mega-rich to pay their way, not to be given a free ride by governments. We expect the Treasurer, the Australian Taxation Office and other government agencies to ensure that they do so.

We expect that Government agencies will be properly staffed and resourced to enable them to fulfil the role the Parliament assigns them.

We expect a fair return to the public purse for allowing our publicly owned resources to be exploited by the private sector.

We demand that full-time workers receive a living wage. A fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work. We support the Australian Conciliation and Arbitration system. We are not fooled by ideologically motivated attacks on the unions that represent many of us.

We value Australia’s role as a responsible member of the international community. However, we expect our leaders to put Australia’s interests first.

We do not support free trade deals that don’t benefit ordinary workers and Australian industry. What we want is fair trade for everyone. The so-called level playing field.

We do not support unrestricted sell-offs of Australian land, companies and residential properties to foreigners.

We are comfortable with State ownership of key assets in a mixed economy. We don’t want our public assets sold and the revenue streams from them forgone forever.

We strongly support our Defence Forces but not politicians getting us continually involved in other people’s wars. We expect that our veterans will be looked after by the government.

We expect our leaders to ensure our security, but not to use “national security” or “law and order” as an excuse to suppress our civil liberties.

We expect that our leaders will ensure that Australia’s technological infrastructure remains on par with the rest of the world.

We expect that our environment will be protected and managed in a sustainable way.

As well as these policy areas it is increasingly clear that Australians don’t care for politicians with a sense of entitlement fattening themselves at our expense whilst simultaneously stripping us of public assets and the revenue stream that is derived from those public assets.

We do not accept that being elected to Parliament is a ticket to enrich yourself and your mates at the public’s expense. Especially if accompanied by the simultaneous grinding into the dirt of those who can least afford it.

Being elected to Parliament is not a carte blanche to do what you want without convincing us first that the proposed course of action is both necessary and reasonable. We do not take to blatant liars in our governments, especially after Mr Abbott’s relentless sustained derision of Julia Gillard over a single instance.

Which of course brings us to hypocrisy: We especially don’t like politicians who attack their opponents only to do the same things (themselves) later. Nor do we like arrogant dismissive leaders who think power means they never have to explain or account for their actions.

Finally, endless wars of words don’t impress us. We don’t particularly care who comes out on top in the verbal jousting in Parliament. You will only gain long-term respect and support by effective action in line with the above principles.

Australia was noted in the 60’s for it’s equality. A classless society one proud of the “fair go” offered to each of us. That’s changed and this government is determined to widen the gap.

14 October 2014, 6.19am AEDT

Do Australians still believe in the fair go? Views on pay suggest not

 Which country favours the biggest pay gap?

The United States was not the country in which people saw the largest gap between CEO and worker as ideal. The identity of that country might come as a surprise.

It was not Germany or Japan or France. It was Australia. We thought the ideal ratio of CEO pay to worker pay would be 8.3.

Not only did Australians approve of the largest gap between CEO and worker, we did so by a fair margin. Here, in order, are the countries seeing the largest pay gaps as ideal:

Kiatpongsan and Norton/Harvard Business School, Chulalongkorn University

The “gap” between Australia at 8.3 and the second place-getter – the US – is 1.6. This is more than twice the “gap” (0.7) between the US and fifth-placed Japan.

By a significant margin Australians are, it seems, most accepting of a large pay gap between those at the top and those at the bottom. This is certainly very different from the image of Australia as a highly egalitarian country.

In The Lucky Country (published in 1964), Donald Horne described Australia as “the most egalitarian of countries” where “most people earn within a few pounds of the average”. Although Horne acknowledged there were still some forms of inequality, he expressed the belief these would fade with time. For Horne, Australia was above all a place that valued egalitarianism.

What’s become of our fabled egalitarianism?

Now, 50 years later, we are the country (at least of those surveyed) most accepting of big differences in pay between those at the bottom and those at the top. What has happened? Is it possible that in the last half-century we have in our values gone from being “the most egalitarian of countries” to the least, or one of the least, egalitarian?A few possible answers to these questions might be considered

So it remains unclear why Australians are accepting of such large pay differences between those at the top and the rest. Is it possible we just no longer believe in the fair go? Let alone know the reality of those differences and how incorrect those beliefs are.