Tag: Communication

Israel Partisans’ use of Disinformation

Israel has further isolated Gaza by deliberately targeting and destroying communications infrastructure. The resulting communications blackouts have thrust Gaza further into the dark, making it increasingly difficult for Palestinians to share evidence of Israeli war crimes with the outside world. As a result, efforts to push back against Israeli disinformation are severely hindered and Israeli propaganda can run amok. 

At the time of writing, Israeli forces have killed over 30,000 Palestinians across Gaza and the West Bank since October 2023. They have targeted hospitals, schools, and civilians fleeing their homes. Israel’s assault is marked not only by the historic scale of violence being inflicted upon Palestinians, but by the unprecedented flood of disinformation being deployed to justify it. 

Source: Israel Partisans’ use of Disinformation

Former NATO Analyst Jacques Baud on Operation Al-Aqsa Flood: The Defeat of the Vanquisher – ScheerPost

How is it NATO supplies a report significantly different to the one Israel produced and the this report is independent of IDF influence.

Clearly, the aim was not to kill civilians, but rather to obtain a bargaining chip for the release of some 5,300 prisoners held by Israel. Eyewitness accounts in the Israeli press suggest that the original idea was to take only military prisoners (who are “more valuable” than civilians for an exchange). These same accounts show that the Palestinians were surprised to find so few military personnel on site, which can be explained by the fact that part of the garrisons had been redeployed to the West Bank a few weeks earlier. Yasmin Porat’s testimony, mentioned above, shows that Hamas fighters stayed with civilians in their homes, waiting for the security forces to intervene. The testimonies indicate that the Palestinian fighters left with civilian prisoners only after the Israeli military had intervened, firing indiscriminately into the houses with their tanks. It therefore appears that the capture of civilians was more the result of a combination of circumstances than a decision taken in advance.

The death of civilians was therefore not an objective, and the fact that the freed hostages declared that they had been treated with respect, and even in a friendly manner, tends to confirm that this was not a “pogrom” against the Israeli population.

Source: Former NATO Analyst Jacques Baud on Operation Al-Aqsa Flood: The Defeat of the Vanquisher – ScheerPost

Tony Abbott ignoring requests for a meeting, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews says . Abbott is doing a Joko and won’t pick up the phone.

 

Daniel Andrews and Tony Abbott

Tony Abbott ignoring requests for a meeting, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews says – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation).

Operation Save Tony’s Job: Same question he asked the union boss when he was a shit manager of a cement delivery company.. He couldn’t bat bowl or field then.

With yesterday’s “Message from the Prime Minister”, delivered to camera and without the presence of reporters, Tony Abbott signalled that he’s chosen populism as the way out of his self-inflicted leadership crisis. No longer will Australia give the “benefit of the doubt” (at the border, in their citizenship application, at Centrelink) to “those who might be a threat to our country”. He advanced no supporting evidence that such benefit is being given, but did promise a fuller statement next Monday. Posing a largely unspecified threat are vaguely identified others – “extremists” influenced by the “Islamic death cult” – for whom the only course of action available is to toughen security laws so as to prevent “evil people” from “exploit[ing] our freedom”.

In the world outside the bubble of prime ministerial rhetoric, there is a debate about how authorities should respond to the threat of “lone wolf” attacks. Experts in “radicalisation” – the process by which alienated individuals adopt increasingly extreme ideas – suggest that tough, us-versus-them talk may have the undesired effect of encouraging radicalisation, by confirming the world-view propagated by advocates. A more effective strategy, experts say, combines social inclusion and explicit de-radicalisation efforts.

But Abbott is desperately seeking a reversal in opinion polling to short-circuit the inevitable second challenge, and he knows that a population fearful of their security can potentially deliver it. Like all political leaders, Abbott mixes populism (he exploited fears of boat people, debt and power prices in opposition) with conviction (breaking electoral promises, cutting spending and awarding a knighthood to Prince Philip, which “wasn’t so much a question” of popularity, Abbott confirmed yesterday). If he’s got the balance wrong in recent months, it’s not that Joe Hockey is a dud treasurer or Peta Credlin is running too tight a ship – it’s that his Chief Whip, Phillip Ruddock, wasn’t communicating to him the mood of his backbench. So this is Operation Save Abbott: a new Whip to open up dialogue with the backbench, a renewed focus on national security and, despite the budget “crisis”, more money for pensioners and the mentally ill.

Russell Marks
Politicoz Editor
Sign up to get Politicoz delivered
to your email address every weekday at lunch time.