Category: Bigotry

The saddest thing – » The Australian Independent Media Network

My point is, in today’s world we are encouraged to turn against those who are different. And we are encouraged to blame someone else for our woes and we are unmoved when they need our help. And we judge them, without even knowing them. We have a federal government who are masters at creating this divisive society, doing so, of course, to deflect the anger of their failures back onto Australians who are different because … (fill in the blanks). Do you have any blanks you can fill in for me?

Source: The saddest thing – » The Australian Independent Media Network

Senate kills off Turnbull government’s changes to 18C race discrimination law

Attorney-General George Brandis described the defeat as a “sad day”.

Source: Senate kills off Turnbull government’s changes to 18C race discrimination law

Note To Selves: Pauline Hanson’s Bigotry Is Now Mainstream And Acceptable – New Matilda

The recasting of One Nation senator Pauline Hanson by a sycophantic media as flawed but holding valid concerns is now complete, writes Michael Brull. It didn’t take long. A few months ago, Pauline Hanson was a marginal figure, a serial loser of Australian politics. No-one took her seriously, and few Australians thought much of her.More

Source: Note To Selves: Pauline Hanson’s Bigotry Is Now Mainstream And Acceptable – New Matilda

#IstandwithMariam: Hate groups launch global attack on Muslim advocate after singlet protest –

Mariam Veiszadeh

#IstandwithMariam: Hate groups launch global attack on Muslim advocate after singlet protest – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation).

Can France combat terrorism with tolerance? – Features – Al Jazeera English. Amazing how the criminal acts of a criminal few demand the justification of whole nations. Tolerance and French identity already exist amongst the French minorities despite predjudice.

Can France combat terrorism with tolerance? – Features – Al Jazeera English.

Andrew Bolt’s campaigning is working. These aren’t Team Australia companies. So much for export.

Pauls Iced Coffee

Iced coffee maker targeted by anti-halal social media campaign

A Northern Territory Muslim leader has defended the use of halal-certified food amid a social media campaign against the maker of a popular iced coffee.

The often hot conditions in the NT mean iced coffee is a popular beverage among people who live in the jurisdiction.

But a campaign mainly on Facebook has begun urging people to stop drinking Paul’s Iced Coffee because it is certified as halal, meaning it is able to be consumed by Muslims.

The campaign often implies that payments made to businesses that conduct halal certification end up supporting Muslim terrorists or involves cruelty against animals.

Vice-chairman of the Islamic Council of the Northern Territory Sadaruddin Chowdhury said the campaign was misguided.

Mr Sadrudin said halal certification was undertaken by private companies, and allowed companies to sell food into Muslim countries such as Indonesia or Saudi Arabia that do not allow non-halal food into their country.

If that is a hidden agenda probably they are probably succeeding in that, making Muslims’ lives in Australia a little bit more difficult

Sadaruddin Chowdhury, Islamic Council of the Northern Territory

Funds from the sale of halal-certified products were no more likely to be used for terrorism than money made by any other business, he told ABC Darwin 105.7.

“Any money can end up with ISIS (Islamic State) if that intention is there by that particular person,” Mr Chowdhury said.

“For that reason law enforcements authorities are who are looking after these things.

“It is not as though it is easy to send this money to somebody without the scrutiny of the law enforcement authorities.”

One of the requirements of halal food is that the animal must be killed in a humane manner and not for pleasure, Mr Chowdhury said.

He said that while removing the certification would be unlikely to harm the companies, it would make life difficult for Muslims in Australia, who would not know which goods adhered to their religious beliefs.

“If that is a hidden agenda probably they are probably succeeding in that, making Muslims’ lives in Australia a little bit more difficult,” Mr Chowdhury said.

Recently, South Australian company Fleurieu Milk and Yoghurt dropped a deal with Emirates Airlines because of a social media backlash.

“The publicity we were getting was quite negative and something we probably didn’t need and we decided we would pull the pin and stop supplying Emirates Airlines,” said Fleurieu’s sales manager Nick Hutchinson.

“Ninety per cent of it has been social media, but I have received calls from people that are quite unhappy, I guess, about our decisions and so forth, and [we have also received] a lot of emails.”

Other products targeted by one group included some varieties of peanut butter, chewing gum, chocolate bars and meat pies.

Parent company of Paul’s – Parmalat – was contacted several times to comment on the situation but did not return calls or an email.

Parmalat’s Australian website says gelatin used in all Paul’s produce is derived from beef hide and is halal approved.

More right-wing rubbish

This painting was supposed to be worth a jail term.

  • November 1, 2014
  • Written by:
  • Hardly a week goes by without receiving an email from a right-winger about how boat people, greenies, Muslims, Aborigines (or any non-White, non-Liberal extremist) is undermining the entire fabric of Australia and the God fearing Western world.I usually press delete after reading two words of their crap.

    This one I read:

    In May 2010 Tohseef Shah spray-painted a British War Memorial with “Islam will dominate  Osama”.

    He was fined £50 and walked free  from court.

    In November 2010 Emdadur Choudhury burned a Poppy during the 2 minutes silence.

    He too was fined £50 and walked free from court.

    Last week in a Portsmouth Court two men were sentenced to 6 months in prison for painting a Poppy on a mosque [refer picture above].

    Pass this on, if you think it’s a disgrace.

    I know you will without question.

    It certainly would be a disgrace – if it were true. It turns out to be just more right-wing bullshit. It has been circulating vigorously via social media websites for over three years despite being a hoax. Yes, a hoax.

    Here’s what really happened:

    The specific stories mentioned in the message are mostly true (but the fines have been mixed up). Tohseef Shah was fined £500 in compensation, £85 court costs and two year conditional discharge for spray painting a memorial statue and Emdadur Choudhury was fined £50 for setting alight a poppy, and finally it is also true that two men have been imprisoned for 12 months for spray painting a mosque. The two men, Steven James Vasey, 32, and 24-year-old Anthony Donald Smith were convicted in Durham this month.

    At first glance, one may justifiably feel angry at this apparent injustice which makes the British justice system appear soft on racial crimes committed by minorities. But as with all brief and racially charged messages circulating the Internet, it does not really tell the whole story.

    Firstly, the two men sentenced for 12 months not only defaced a mosque but additionally put a brick through a window of an Asian run business and spray painted two other properties ran by Asians, and by the defendents own admission their actions were racially motivated and planned in advance – this in contrast to Tohseef Shah who`s actions were deemed to be political. Racially motivated crimes often receive heftier sentences and despite, for example, Emdadur Choudhurys crime of poppy burning being more controversial, strictly in the eyes of the law, the two men from Durham committed a more heinous crime.

    Sentencing is based on many different factors, especially including the severity of the crime and the judge handing the sentence and of course there will be what many percieve to be lighter sentences and heavier sentences given for what appear to be similar crimes of similar severity. However if you think that lighter sentences seem to be reserved for people who are of Asian descent you would be wrong, because a message like this will duly omit the numerous accounts of racial hatred aimed towards Muslims that have not been met with a custodial sentence, such as the case of Wayne Havercroft who was only fined for leaving a pigs head outside a proposed location for a mosque and a spray painted sign saying “No Mosque here. EDL” – or the Sunderland man who was only fined for spray painting a mosque.

    This message has picked three – albeit true – stories because they fit the overall meaning the message attempts to convey – hatred towards what the message creator believes to be a racially corrupt/soft justice system. Whilst one could reasonally argue that the two men from Durham did receive a significantly harsher sentence than both the men in the other two stories, it should be noted that these are just three stories and does not necessarily accurately reflect the way the British justice system convicts people of differing faiths.

    I have seen similar articles on this (and other sites) exposing and denouncing right-wing bullshit, and noticed that the authors of the particular articles have been condemned for publicising the right-wing propaganda. The authors have made the claim that they are merely attempting to set the record straight. If there is nobody willing to do so, then this rubbish will continue to fill our in-boxes and social media sites unchallenged.

    So if this email finds its way to you – you can do what I did – reply with a nice little note saying it’s a load of crap.