Why is he voting No in Australia? This just might be a clue

Lachlan believes in the reality of “systems” agreeing with Tucker Carlson’s “great replacement theory”. Which makes him more Hansonite and fiercely anti- Multiculturalist. But when it comes to Indigenous Australians who can’t be deported from their land, and can’t be “sterilised”, as proposed by Lang Hancock Gina’s land-grabbing father, he claims like Dutton and the No campaign there is no “systemic racism in Australia”.  Only a Woke lack of acceptance and antipathy to be allowed to complete a process of unfinished re-education or Assimilation. Which has continuously failed for 250 years or should we be clearer for 50 years since the 1969 referendum recognizing Australia’s First People.

In fact, if it’s not racist, why does it sound so very pro-Chinese leaning toward their necessary process of the re-education of the ethnic Uyghurs? Or so Russian where Siberia is a place elected for the special psychiatric re-education of any individual opposition to Putin. Murdoch like Dutton like all No campaigners is all over the shop encouraging neo-Nazis to come out and openly walk our streets at the behest of the No campaign.

He has also defended Tucker Carlson’s airing of the “great replacement theory,” a conspiracy theory that falsely alleges that white people are intentionally and systematically being replaced by immigrants, and continuously argued that Fox News’s coverage is both balanced and fair.

Source: Lachlan Murdoch “considerably more brutal” than his father