The ICJ’s authoritative ruling on the Israeli occupation makes clear that boycotts, divestment, and sanctions against Israeli occupation, colonization, and apartheid are not only a moral imperative but also a legal obligation.
The ICJ finds that BDS is not merely a right, but an obligation
Major media face a reassessment of their Israel coverage after the ICJ judgement, writes Mick Hall.
“I don’t think the ICJ presents an imperative for media outlets like ABC to change their language. The Australian state is a close ally of the U.S. and Israel and their economic interests are deeply interwoven. Western states and media institutions, contrary to their own assertions, are largely anti-democratic in nature and strive, first and foremost, to protect the political and economic interests of their ruling class.”
August 8, 2024
CBS News was the worst. The network, which once employed genuine journalists like Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather, has so far not aired a single report on the court’s decision.
US Media Downplays and Ignores ICJ Ruling Declaring Israeli Occupation Illegal
The attempt by Zionist lobbyists to silence criticism of Israel is running in top gear to try to counter the swell of public opinion against Israel flowing from the exposure in real time of the barbarity of its actions in Gaza.
The attempted suppression is widespread in the United States where pressure has been put on Congress and many universities to adopt and implement the definition, and the lobby has been equally diligent in its efforts in England and Europe.
Zionist attempts to silence criticism running in top gear after ICJ ruling
Maureen Clare Murphy 19 July 2024
Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal, a form of apartheid, and must end, says the U.N.’s high court at The Hague.
The ICJ Ruling Confirms What Palestinians Have Been Saying for 57 Years
olddogthoughts 
You must be logged in to post a comment.