The Precedent Set by Kyle Rittenhouse Wasn’t on Trial

KENOSHA, WISCONSIN - NOVEMBER 19: Judge Bruce Schroeder, right, listens as the verdicts are ready by Judicial Assistant Tami Mielcarek in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial at the Kenosha County Courthouse on November 19, 2021 in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Rittenhouse was found not guilty of all charges in the shooting of three demonstrators, killing two of them, during a night of unrest that erupted in Kenosha after a police officer shot Jacob Blake seven times in the back while being arrested in August 2020. Rittenhouse, from Antioch, Illinois, claimed self-defense who at the time of the shooting was armed with an assault rifle.  (Photo by Sean Krajacic - Pool/Getty Images)

Yes Judge Shroeder set more than just the tone but the standard by which he claims he lives and we all should. We should all live our lives like vigilante’s and simply as we “feel”. Had someone shot Rittenhouse at the time he was shooting not victims but “rioters” and had a “feeling” would we be discharged or convicted given Judge Bruce Shroeder declared Rittenhouse a vigilante who crossed statelines with a semi automatic rifle was the ‘victim and the dead men were guilty and deserved to be shot. Shroeder and Abbott have rewritten and set the America’s new NRA Gold Standard

Raise your hand if you agree life is more important than property,” prosecutor Thomas Binger said to the jury in his closing arguments. “The only person who shot and killed anyone was the defendant. Yes, there was property damage. No one’s here to defend that. No one’s here to tell you it’s OK to commit arson or looting. No one’s here to tell you it’s okay to be rioters. … But what you don’t get to do is kill someone on the street for committing arson.” Yet thanks to this jury verdict, more people will undoubtedly try to. Related Rittenhouse Jury Has to Decide If the Men Who Tried to Stop Him Were Heroes or Villains We can’t say we didn’t see it coming. Judge Bruce Schroeder’s decision to allow the men laying dead at Rittenhouse’s feet to be called “looters” or “rioters” but not “victims” set a tone that continued, ruling after ruling. Yes: One of the people Rittenhouse shot — Gaige Grosskreutz – was armed. I find that insufficient justification for the death of two other men. No, the legal argument failed. And that was the only argument jurors were ever going to hear in court. But it’s not the only question that you and I as American citizens have to wrestle with.

Source: The Precedent Set by Kyle Rittenhouse Wasn’t on Trial

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.