Yes Judge Shroeder set more than just the tone but the standard by which he claims he lives and we all should. We should all live our lives like vigilante’s and simply as we “feel”. Had someone shot Rittenhouse at the time he was shooting not victims but “rioters” and had a “feeling” would we be discharged or convicted given Judge Bruce Shroeder declared Rittenhouse a vigilante who crossed statelines with a semi automatic rifle was the ‘victim and the dead men were guilty and deserved to be shot. Shroeder and Abbott have rewritten and set the America’s new NRA Gold Standard

“Raise your hand if you agree life is more important than property,” prosecutor Thomas Binger said to the jury in his closing arguments. “The only person who shot and killed anyone was the defendant. Yes, there was property damage. No one’s here to defend that. No one’s here to tell you it’s OK to commit arson or looting. No one’s here to tell you it’s okay to be rioters. … But what you don’t get to do is kill someone on the street for committing arson.” Yet thanks to this jury verdict, more people will undoubtedly try to. Related Rittenhouse Jury Has to Decide If the Men Who Tried to Stop Him Were Heroes or Villains We can’t say we didn’t see it coming. Judge Bruce Schroeder’s decision to allow the men laying dead at Rittenhouse’s feet to be called “looters” or “rioters” but not “victims” set a tone that continued, ruling after ruling. Yes: One of the people Rittenhouse shot — Gaige Grosskreutz – was armed. I find that insufficient justification for the death of two other men. No, the legal argument failed. And that was the only argument jurors were ever going to hear in court. But it’s not the only question that you and I as American citizens have to wrestle with.

Source: The Precedent Set by Kyle Rittenhouse Wasn’t on Trial