He conceded that the presumptive GOP nominee’s Orlando response was
Source: Stephen Colbert Goads Bill O’Reilly Into Big Admission About Trump
He conceded that the presumptive GOP nominee’s Orlando response was
Source: Stephen Colbert Goads Bill O’Reilly Into Big Admission About Trump

Ensaf Haidar (centre) the wife of Saudi blogger Raif Badawi, at a vigil in Montreal on January 13.
IS’s video production values are sickeningly creepy – the prisoners in orange jumpsuits; their would-be executioner in black, wielding a knife and spewing bile.
But in matters of jurisprudence, the Saudis are every bit as sickening as IS. They share the same Saudi-sponsored, ultra-conservative strain of Sunni Islam. And they think alike on crime and punishment – they both want to kill, kill, kill.
A protest by Amnesty International in support of Raif Badawi in front of the Saudi Embassy in The Hague on January 15. Photo: AFPHomosexuals? Kill them! Adulterers? If they’re married, stone them to death; if they are unmarried, a lashing will do. A thief? Chop off a hand or a foot.
But best of all, both the Saudis and IS get off on a good beheading. According to Human Rights Watch, there were 87 beheadings in Saudi Arabia last year – and they’re off to a great start this year, with 11 beheadings already and still two Fridays left in January.
Those silly Saudis think they can kid us into believing that they are not like that, but in recent weeks we have had a wondrous display of Riyadh’s hypocrisy.
They dispatched Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Nizar Madani to Paris for the leaders-linking-arms rally in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo massacre – which was as much for freedom of speech as it was against terrorism. But back in Saudi Arabia, they were calling for crowds to assemble for the first in a series of 20 lashings for 31-year-old Raif Badawi, whose crime was to express himself freely.
Badawi is, or was, a blogger before they shut him down in 2012, because of his criticism and questioning of the religious establishment – for which his punishment was fixed at 1000 lashes, 10 years in jail and a fine of more than $US260,000.
Gruesome punishment: Raif Badawi at home in Saudi Arabia in 2012. Photo: AFPIn many ways Badawi is quite conservative. Urging a separation between church and state is not exactly radical; he rebuked the Muslims who lobbied for the right to open a mosque near New York’s Ground Zero.
And never mind the ballyhoo in the post-Charlie Hebdo world, with constant demands for Muslims to seriously debate the use and abuse of their religion. That’s precisely what Badawi was doing – and look where it got him.
On January 9, the slight-framed Badawi was hauled from a bus in a square outside a mosque as Friday prayers ended in the port city of Jeddah – and dealt the first 50 of his 1000 lashes, by a uniformed man brandishing a wooden cane.
The Saudis would have us believe that this punishment is administered caringly – the caner is required to move up and down the victim’s back and to take care not to break the skin. But come last Friday, when Badawi was to get another 50 of the best, a doctor declared that his “wounds [from the previous week] had not yet healed properly and that he would not be able to withstand another round of lashes at this time”.
That was too much for Said Boumedouha, Amnesty International‘s deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa. He retorted: “The notion that Raif Badawi must be allowed to heal so that he can suffer this cruel punishment again and again, is macabre and outrageous.”
When IS throws accused homosexuals to their death from the top of a tall building, it tweets pictures and uploads video to social media. But not those Saudi killjoys – when a policeman last week videoed the mediaeval beheading of a female migrant worker in the holy city of Mecca and exercised his freedom of expression by uploading the clip on YouTube, he was arrested and has apparently disappeared into the maw of the Saudi security system, reportedly to face unspecified charges in two courts – one military, the other religious.
IS would have given him a medal. The Burmese woman, named as Laila bint Abdul Muttalib Basim in one report, was dragged through the streets and held down by four policemen, while it took three blows from the executioner’s sword to sever her head – and as he hacked away, she used her last breath to scream: “I didn’t kill. I didn’t kill.”
How strange it is, then, that we’re at war with IS, but the Saudis are our allies. We don’t hear Barack Obama or John Kerry threatening to bomb the Saudis or even rebuking them. That’s left to an eminently forgettable spokesperson at the State Department who utters a few words of criticism – you know the drill, always enough to say the US has been critical; but never enough for the Saudis to be seriously offended.
And where is the crusading Tony Abbott when he’s needed? There’s a man who will go halfway around the world to bray at IS as a death cult, as he did in Baghdad recently. But just a stone’s throw to the south of the Iraqi capital is Riyadh – Beheading Central – and Abbott has nothing to say about the royals whose robes never get bloodied despite all the killing, because they’ve contracted all that nasty stuff out to the Wahhabi clerics – of whom they live in fear.

Je suis les victimes du Boko Haram! I am the victims of Boko Haram in northern Nigeria, who were slaughtered in their thousands this week, a story overclouded by the terrorist attacks in which twenty people died in Paris. Another forgotten Africa story in a callous two-faced world with two sets of weights and measures.
So where was the solidarity march of Hollande, Cameron, Sarkozy, Poroshenko and Netanyahu, and company, in Nigeria? After all they were quick to show up in Paris, walking some fifty meters towards the media on a street which had been cleared of people and which had on both sidewalks armed police looking on, before the politicians split up and went their separate ways to the airport. All you have to do is see a photograph which was taken from a different angle.
So the Charlie Hebdo attack and subsequent shootings elsewhere served to further their own political careers – Cameron in his election year, Sarko clinging onto the fringes of French politics, Hollande sans femme, Bibi welcoming all French Jews to Israel and Poroshenko waving madly at some non-existent fairy on the empty sidewalk. What about Africa?
What about Africa, indeed? You know, the dark continent full of dark people and dark stories. A continent of danger, disease, disaster… or so our media would have us believe. That is why, ladies and gentlemen, in 2015, the benchmark year of the Millennium Development Goals, the vast majority of humankind is speaking about Charlie Hebdo’s sell-out print run of three million copies today yet is unaware that anything happened in northern Nigeria.
In the town of Baga and the surrounding villages, this week on a six-day killing spree, terrorists from the Boko Haram militant group slaughtered, according to some reports, up to two thousand civilians – including women, children and the elderly. Twenty thousand people fled and are now living in precarious conditions in the bush around Baga, terrified for their lives. Buildings were razed to the ground, everyone that moved was slaughtered in cold blood. The motive appears to be an attempt to frighten people away from voting in the upcoming Presidential election on February 14.
The point is, why so many tears over twenty victims in Paris and none over two thousand victims in Nigeria? It is not necessary for anyone to answer the question, because the answer comes with western foreign policy and the media outlets which whitewash this and tarnish regions and continents outside North America, the EU and Australia as being threatening and menacing, justifying measures which increase security. In other words, justifying control of lobbies and the politicians they place in power, through the manipulation of fear, creating a powerful “id” to justify the “ego”, a powerful “them” to justify the “us”.
And so people are indifferent. They and their elected politicians (pawns used by the banking, energy, food, finance, pharmaceutical and weapons lobbies to further their interests) show indignation when a handful of white people are killed by a couple of psychopaths, when the right to freedom of expression is attacked. Yet they say nothing when western agents hack into social media and systematically try to interfere with e-mail accounts, social media accounts and websites. That for them is fair game. So much for freedom of expression.
But when two thousand Africans are slaughtered and twenty thousand others have to flee from their homes (whatever the exact figures) then nobody wants to know. It’s Africa after all, the continent which hits the headlines with Ebola, drought and floods and massacres – disease, disaster and death – which apparently generates no good news stories.
And so ladies and gentlemen welcome to our comfy squeaky clean little world, where you can chortle in amusement watching belches on the Simpsons as you sip your Port wine, slurp your beer, guzzle your carbonated drinks and stuff yourselves with potato chips or bagels, throw into the trash thirty percent of the produce in your fridges every week, and swallow what the media feed you hook, line and sinker.
This is exactly why countries like France, the UK and US (the FUKUS Axis) manage to get away with their own terrorist acts in Libya (where they deployed munitions against civilians, where they sided with terrorists on their own lists of proscribed groups), in Syria (where they sided with those who perpetrated chemical attacks and then blamed President Assad, where they sided again with terrorists to overthrow a Government) and acts of intrusion and interference such as in Ukraine, where the democratically elected President was ousted in a Fascist coup, before Fascist massacres were perpetrated by those with whom the west sides.
And for the victims of Boko Haram in Nigeria? Where are Cameron, Hollande, Netanyahu and Poroshenko? Nowhere! Je suis les victims du Boko Haram!
Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey