Trump

Here We Go: Trump’s Got A ‘Final Solution’ | Crooks and Liars

Here We Go: Trump's Got A 'Final Solution'

Trump echoes Hitler’s ‘final solution’ rhetoric in his latest speeches over the weekend.

“Give me a break—I mean, it’s Trump,” said Lindsey Graham.

“I have zero concern,” said Marco Rubio.

“I don’t think it’s encouragement at all,” said retired Gen. Keith Kellogg. “We know what he means when he says it.”

The press must find this very familiar. The dismissive attitude that Republicans claim to have toward Trump’s expressed intent to turn his back on Europe is the same mindset the national media shows toward Trump flat-out proclaiming that he’s going to rid the nation of political opponents and conduct a purge of “globalists” and “communists.”

It’s just Trump. It’s not like he actually means what he says. And says again. And again.

Now, let’s check in to see if Biden made an error in grammar. That’s worth a headline.

Source: Here We Go: Trump’s Got A ‘Final Solution’ | Crooks and Liars

One thought on “Here We Go: Trump’s Got A ‘Final Solution’ | Crooks and Liars”

  1. In one of his many great documentaries, Michael Moore emphasizes statistics revealing that around three quarters of Americans support a number of ‘socialist’/public programs, notably universal health care and some form of guaranteed income plan [‘welfare’]. The corpocratic Nancy Pelosi doesn’t really care.

    While I find that the Republican party, like its federal Conservative party in Canada, is a moral write-off altogether when it comes to humane social policy, the DNC also refuses to allow genuinely fiscally progressive candidates like Bernie Sanders as its presidential nominee, regardless of what Democratic Party members/voters want.

    Hilary Clinton’s neo-liberalism, unlike Sanders’ fiscal progressiveness, was already known for not rubbing against big money/business and power grains. Perhaps not surprising, even the New York Times is hostile toward Sanders’ ideals and desires for disenfranchised, low- or no-incomed Americans.

    I find it arrogantly presumptuous of the DNC and party (etcetera) to expect poor citizens to vote for an establishment Democrat candidate with thinly veiled ties to corporate interests and who’s not going to adequately improve the poor person’s lot in life — simply to vote out or keep out an undesirable, hated Republican. And, of course, many voters get to wait in long, bad-weather lineups for the privilege of participating in it.

    Like

Comments are closed.