No, there was no “lie” about Iraq.  Andrew Wilkie should know better

Rumsfeld,  Cheney, Bush and born again Blair vs the Australian Lieutenant Colonel  Andrew Wilkie ex of  Australian Intelligence who advised us that despite all intel and UN advice that there was no evidence of any WMDs in Iraq. Who should we believe John Howard who is now apologising for being dumb. He and the USA were all dumbed out by the info but the decision  to invade  but it was still right. Or the majority historical opinion that the power vacuum it created  and we are experiencing today was not justified by bullshit but what?. Whose word should the true integrity of that decision be decided the participants, historians or Andrew Bolt who says history should take a back seat from the point of his birthin 1959. The man is a media warmonger after all